Matt Carberry (kingpin248) wrote,
Matt Carberry

SOPA/PIPA, revised and extended

My main website and the Z-Ratings are currently blacked out and will remain so until midnight EST (05:00 UTC Thursday), in (almost totally symbolic) observance of the Internet "strike" against the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act (aka PROTECT IP Act). This blog remains up because I did not wish to take the risk of deleting it, and all of the means to blackout/redirect that I've seen make use of JavaScript, which is prohibited on LiveJournal for security reasons.

The bills themselves are bad enough, and I'll get to them shortly. But at least with respect to SOPA, I'm gonna attack the messenger, or more precisely, the primary sponsor - Lamar Smith (R-Texas), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. I've seen his name come up before in stuff I read at Reason, and he strikes me as a man who is impervious to both popular opinion and the weight of evidence. He's an hardcore drug warrior and ardently anti-immigration. And he made it clear today that despite what Eric Cantor said over the weekend, markup on SOPA will continue next month. He also called Wikipedia's blackout action "a publicity stunt." Um, DUH! That's why it's being done - to raise awareness of what a piece of shit your bill is!

Smith says that the concerns are overblown and this sort of power wouldn't be wielded against sites like Wikipedia. In other words: "you can trust us, we know what we're doing." Last I heard, 89 percent of the population failed to express a positive opinion of the United States Congress. And as for the Internet specifically, when I think of how Congress sees it, what's the first thing that comes to my mind? Ted Stevens and his series of tubes. Chris Heald of Mashable did something that I'd bet no more than 10 percent of the 435 Representatives has done - he read the SOPA bill. He lays out just how vague the statutory language is. Such a wide net isn't going to ensnare everybody. But it gives the Department of Justice a whole lot of discretion, and opens the door to abuse. Think DoJ can't get creative with its interpretations of Federal law? Ask marine biologist Nancy Black about that. But don't U. S. Attorneys place serious stock in their public trust? They would never silence critics or be vindictive, right? It's too bad Siobhan Reynolds recently died in a place crash; otherwise, I think she'd beg to differ.

Too much power and too much discretion in the hands of too few people. A legal process that turns the American tradition of presumption of innocence on its head. Support from the MPAA and RIAA, who can do little more than stand athwart history and yell "STOP!" And from what I'm seen, no popular support whatsoever. Today's actions have provided a lot of momentum against SOPA and PIPA, but these bills need to be totally incinerated, because they're so bad that I wouldn't wipe my ass with the paper they're printed on.

  • THANK YOU SENIORS!!! (clap clap clapclapclap)

    To the Cornell Athletics class of 2021, Congratulations on crossing the finish line! It's an accomplishment that you have earned every right to…

  • Job updates.

    I last wrote about the ongoing and slow-going job search two months ago, in the aftermath of an interview in southern Maryland. Since then, I'm in…

  • Miss America 2013. No, this isn't a joke post.

    On Saturday night, playoff football was in full swing. Packers vs. 49ers, too -- a good game, at least in the first half. But shortly after nine, it…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.